Four Markets. Four Different Stories.
What the FY2026 Small Area Fair Market Rent data reveals about Cleveland, Boston, Atlanta, and Los Angeles — and what it means for Section 8 owners and multifamily investors in each.
HUD published the FY2026 Small Area Fair Market Rents in the fall of 2025. The data is public, ZIP-level, and updated annually. It is the same data source that determines the threshold test in every Section 8 Rent Comparability Study conducted this year. Most Section 8 owners have never looked at it for their own property.
What it shows across four markets right now is striking — and the variation is not what a national headline about rental market conditions would suggest.
The National Story Is Not Your Story
The FY2026 national average Operating Cost Adjustment Factor — the annual percentage by which Section 8 contract rents are automatically adjusted at renewal — is 5.1%. That figure, published in the Federal Register on February 3, 2026 and effective February 11, represents HUD’s composite estimate of how much operating costs have increased across nine expense categories: electricity, employee wages, insurance, property taxes, fuel, and four others.
For most Section 8 owners renewing a contract right now, OCAF is the default. It requires no study, no engagement, no analysis. The adjustment happens automatically. And for properties in markets where SAFMR is growing at roughly the same rate as OCAF — or faster — that default may be broadly reasonable in any given year.
But OCAF is a state-level factor — HUD calculates it at the state level because, as the Federal Register notice states directly, that is “the lowest level of geographical aggregation with enough projects to permit statistical analysis.” It does not know what ZIP code your property is in. It does not know whether the market supporting your contract rent has appreciated by 5.8% or declined by 9.6% since the last fiscal year. It adjusts operating costs. It does not adjust market position.
That gap — between what OCAF tracks and what the local rental market is actually doing — is what the SAFMR data makes visible. And across four markets in FY2026, that gap looks very different depending on where you are.
Cleveland — The Midwest Appreciation Story
ZIP code 44106 sits in the University Circle and East Side corridor that has been central to Cleveland’s multifamily narrative for the past several years. The FY2026 SAFMR for a two-bedroom unit in this ZIP is $1,450 — up from $1,370 in FY2025. That is a 5.8% annual increase, roughly in line with Ohio’s FY2026 OCAF of 4.9%.
For a Section 8 owner in this ZIP, that alignment between SAFMR growth and OCAF is relatively favorable in the current year — operating costs and market rents are moving in the same direction at approximately the same pace. A property that has renewed on OCAF through a period of sustained SAFMR growth, however, may carry a contract rent that reflects market conditions from an earlier cycle — the current year’s alignment does not close a gap that accumulated across prior years.
For a multifamily investor evaluating Cleveland assets, the 5.8% SAFMR growth in this ZIP is a market intelligence signal — fundamentals are strengthening, demand is absorbing new supply, and the neighborhood trajectory continues to reflect upward rent movement at the ZIP level.
Boston — High Absolute, Negligible Movement
ZIP code 02119 — Roxbury — tells a different story. The FY2026 SAFMR for a two-bedroom unit is $2,560, up from $2,550 in FY2025. That is a 0.4% annual change. Massachusetts FY2026 OCAF is 4.8%.
The math here is straightforward but its implications are not immediately obvious. OCAF is adjusting contract rents upward by 4.8% while the SAFMR moved only 0.4%. In the current year, OCAF is outpacing SAFMR movement in Roxbury. For an owner whose contract rent is already well below the $2,560 SAFMR — the relevant observation is not the current year movement but the absolute position: the gap between contract rents and SAFMR in this ZIP is measured in hundreds of dollars per unit per month, accumulated over years of prior appreciation that OCAF never captured.
The Boston story is also a study in intra-metro variation. The heat map across the Boston metro shows a range from deep red to deep green within a few miles — some ZIPs declining, others appreciating, others flat. The metro-level FMR obscures all of it. This is precisely why the Section 9-14 threshold test in the RCS uses the ZIP-level SAFMR rather than the metro FMR — and why a property in Roxbury and a property in a suburban Boston ZIP can have completely different market position stories even though they are in the same HUD Metro FMR Area.
For a multifamily investor, the negligible FY2026 SAFMR movement in Roxbury after years of significant prior appreciation is a market maturation signal — not a deterioration, but a plateau following a long run-up. The absolute rent levels remain among the highest in the dataset.
Atlanta — The City That Is Two Markets
Atlanta’s heat map does something none of the other cities do quite as dramatically: it shows the intra-metro contrast in a single frame. The screenshots from the MarketRent™ SAFMR Heat Map show two Atlanta ZIPs within a few miles of each other telling opposite stories.
ZIP 30310 — recorded a FY2026 2BR SAFMR of $1,440, down from $1,590 in FY2025. That is a 9.4% annual decline. Georgia’s FY2026 OCAF is 5.4% — which means a Section 8 owner in this ZIP is receiving an automatic 5.4% operating cost adjustment while the market rent benchmark HUD uses for the threshold test dropped 9.4%. The OCAF is moving in one direction; the SAFMR is moving in the opposite direction at nearly double the rate.
ZIP 30318 — recorded a FY2026 2BR SAFMR of $2,050, up from $1,990 in FY2025. A 3.0% increase. Same metro, same FY2026 OCAF - completely different market position signal.
For Section 8 owners in Atlanta, the ZIP code is not a detail — it is the analysis. An owner in 30310 whose contract rent was set against FY2025 SAFMR levels is now holding a rent structure that may look more aligned to the current market than it did a year ago, but that still may reflect years of accumulated below-market positioning from prior periods of appreciation. An owner in 30318 is in a market that has been growing steadily and where the SAFMR-to-contract-rent gap may be widening rather than closing.
For a multifamily investor in Atlanta, this intra-metro variation is the story. Two ZIPs, four miles apart, with a 12.4 percentage point spread in FY2026 SAFMR movement. Neighborhood-level analysis is not optional in this market — it is the only analysis that produces actionable intelligence.
Los Angeles — When the Market Moves Against You
ZIP 90011 — South Los Angeles — recorded a FY2026 2BR SAFMR of $2,070, down from $2,290 in FY2025. A 9.6% annual decline. California FY2026 OCAF is 4.9%.
This is the data point that carries the most strategic weight for Section 8 owners in the LA market. OCAF is adjusting contract rents upward by 4.9% on the operating cost side while the market rent benchmark that determines the RCS threshold test dropped 9.6%. A property in this ZIP that was planning to commission an RCS based on its FY2025 SAFMR position — when the 2BR threshold sat at $2,290 — is now working against a FY2026 threshold that is $220 per unit per month lower. The market has moved against the study’s premise between the planning and execution stages.
This does not mean an RCS is not worth pursuing for a property in this market. Properties with contract rents significantly below the FY2026 SAFMR still have a legitimate market alignment opportunity to pursue. What it means is that the SAFMR data from the current fiscal year — not the prior year, not a general sense of “the LA market is expensive” — is the right starting point for evaluating whether and when to commission the study.
What the Four Markets Tell You Together
The table below summarizes what the FY2026 SAFMR data shows across the four markets and how it relates to the current-year OCAF for each state.
The pattern that emerges from these five data points is not a single market narrative. It is a framework. OCAF moves in one direction at the state level. SAFMR moves in a different direction at the ZIP level. The gap between where those two lines sit — for a specific property in a specific ZIP with a specific contract rent history — is what determines whether pursuing a market-based rent adjustment through the RCS process is likely to produce a meaningful result in the current renewal cycle.
That determination cannot be made at the metro level. It cannot be made from OCAF alone. It requires ZIP-level market position analysis — which is precisely what HUD’s own SAFMR data is designed to support.
What the SAFMR Data Is — and What It Is Not
The FY2026 SAFMR figures in this analysis are the most current published data available. They are not, however, a real-time picture of market conditions. HUD calculates SAFMR annually using American Community Survey data that reflects rental market conditions from a prior period — the reference data underlying the FY2026 schedule was collected in earlier years and adjusted forward using inflation factors. By the time a fiscal year’s SAFMR is published and in effect, the market it describes may have already moved.
In an appreciating market, this lag means the published SAFMR is running behind where rents actually are. The threshold test in the Section 9-14 analysis — which compares a property’s gross renewal rent potential against 150% of the SAFMR gross renewal rent potential — is set against a benchmark that may understate current market rents. HUD sizes the threshold at 150% specifically to create enough headroom that a properly prepared RCS, using current verified comparable data, can support rents that reflect conditions as of the appraisal date rather than conditions of the prior reference period. The threshold accommodates the lag by design.
In a declining market, the lag works in the other direction. A ZIP where SAFMR dropped 9.6% in a single fiscal year — as ZIP 90011 in Los Angeles did between FY2025 and FY2026 — experienced that deterioration in the underlying market before the published data reflected it. The verified comparable rents that an appraiser will find in that market today may be lower still than the FY2026 SAFMR suggests. An owner planning a renewal strategy around last year’s SAFMR position, or around a general sense that Los Angeles rents are high, may find the RCS conclusion lands below their expectations.
For forward-thinking investors, SAFMR trajectory functions as a confirmation signal rather than a leading indicator. A ZIP with consecutive years of SAFMR growth is a ZIP where the underlying rental market has been performing — the published data is confirming a trend the comp market already established. A single-year SAFMR decline of the magnitude seen in Los Angeles and Atlanta’s 30310 reflects a deterioration that was already underway before the data captured it. For acquisition underwriting, understanding which direction the lag is running — whether the published SAFMR is understating or overstating current market conditions — is as important as the SAFMR figure itself.
Part 2 of this series will examine the multi-year SAFMR trend across these four markets against the OCAF compounding history — the analysis that shows how the lag accumulates over time and what it means for properties that have been renewing without a market-based rent adjustment for several consecutive cycles.
What This Means for Your Renewal Strategy
For Section 8 owners approaching contract renewal in any of these markets: the SAFMR calculator at clarendon.com will show you your current ZIP-level gap in minutes. If the gap is meaningful — and in several of these markets it is, even accounting for the current-year SAFMR movement — the Phase 1 Market Position Assessment is the next step. A structured review of your SAFMR position, the current comp landscape, and your non-shelter services inventory gives you the information needed to make the renewal decision with data rather than assumption.
If any of these markets intersect with a decision you are working through — renewal timing, acquisition underwriting, or portfolio positioning — we welcome the conversation. Clarendon provides HUD Rent Comparability Studies, market studies, brokerage, and advisory services across major United States markets.
Related Resources
Explore the FY2026 SAFMR data behind this analysis — SAFMR Heat Map and SAFMR Calculator
Podcast • Tools • Services • Archive • About • Contact
About: Clarendon is a trusted partner for government compliance and advisory solutions, specializing in HUD-compliant services: HUD RCS, appraisals, brokerage, inspections, facility support and strategic guidance for agencies, housing authorities and property owners nationwide.
© 2026 The Clarendon Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Disclosure